![]() ![]() "You can eat, but machines do everything else." Kramer decides that, in this case, life would still be worth living, "because I could still go to the coffee shop. Kramer votes to pull the plug, explaining: "I gotta have a central nervous system!" The lawyer goes on: "One lung, blind, and you're eating through a tube." Kramer declines this life, too: "That's not my style." "All right," the lawyer says, offering one more scenario. "You have a liver, kidneys and a gall bladder but no central nervous system," the lawyer intones. The lawyer goes through a list of situations in which a person might want his life support terminated. Link to book at Amazon.There's a scene in a "Seinfeld" episode in which Kramer, after reacting emotionally to a movie about a woman in a coma, sits down with a lawyer to prepare a living will. The axioms may be logical and sensible, but they do not describe real human behavior. No wonder even hard-headed, rational thinking economists have been forced to reconsider their logical, sensible axioms. Nothing is more convincing than your own wayward behavior. Draw your own conclusions: the examples, although artificial, are very compelling, especially when you will fall into his carefully constructed traps. If there is any weakness, it is that most of the studies done with Tversky relied upon simple examples and questionnaires rather than on real behavior, in context. ![]() The book covers a wide range of phenomena, producing very important, counter-intuitive insights to many aspects of everyday life. I have long used their work and examples in my own thinking and writing (although I resisted Kahneman's attempts to get me to use pupil size as a measure of Attentional load). Both are brilliant, both have contributed much. ![]() I worked briefly with Tversky in he early 1960s and met Kahneman soon afterwards. I have known both Kahneman and Tversky for a long time. But I have a finer level of analysis for the fast system. My reflective level is basically the same as Kahneman's Slow, System 2. In my own work, I thought two systems was far too great a simplification, so I used three: visceral, behavioral, and reflective. Come on, Danny, how are we supposed to remember which is which - couldn't you have called them slow and fast? Why those names? Fast and slow? Actually, Kahneman calls them System 1 (fast) and System 2 (slow). It can be very difficult for the slow system to over rule the fast one, which thereby gives rise to many human idiosyncrasies. The fast system is based upon experience, the slow one upon conscious reasoning and deduction. The two operate according to very different principles and often reach opposite conclusions. ![]() We have two systems, says Kahneman, one fast (and subconscious) and one slow (and conscious). The basic theme builds upon a highly oversimplified view of human thought. Through a mixture of example and metaphor. At the outset, the author introduces us to the book’s two main characters, Systems 1 and 2, which is our two modes of cognition. The goal of the book is to communicate dual processing theory, the idea that our brain engages in two different forms of thought. Kahneman has stated that he considers it a joint prize for the two of them.) Reviews the book, Thinking, Fast and Slow by Daniel Kahneman (see record 2011-26535-000). System 1 is fast, intuitive, and emotional System 2 is slower, more deliberative. Unfortunately, Tversky died before the prize was awarded, and the rules state that only live people can get it. In his mega bestseller, Thinking, Fast and Slow, Daniel Kahneman, the renowned psychologist and winner of the Nobel Prize in Economics, takes us on a groundbreaking tour of the mind and explains the two systems that drive the way we think. (Technically, this is not a Nobel prize because it was added afterwards, but it is treated as equal by everyone. The work has been controversial, but its impact was also substantial, sufficient for the Nobel committee to present Kahneman the Nobel Prize in economics. Their work has demonstrated that many of the underlying assumptions of economists are faulty. Together, they studied how people make decisions and judgments. Much of his work was done with his long-time collaborator, Amos Tversky. Today he has shifted to the positive psychology movement, studying people's judgments of happiness and contentment. His early work has focused upon attention and decision making. In this book, Danny Kahneman summarizes his life of research on human psychology. This is an excellent summary of the latest thinking in the psychology of thought judgment, and decision making, written by one of the foremost scholars in the area. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |